BY MARK HOWELL
Citizen Staff Writer
KEY WEST — Opening today in 500 cities in the United
States, including Key West, Michael Moore's latest film,
"Fahrenheit 9/11," already is raising temperatures.
Hailed in Europe as his masterpiece, Moore's movie is late
in arriving on its native shores. Sight unseen, it has been
decried by American right-wingers for its attack on President
Bush. Even a leading liberal writer, plus the author of the
book "Fahrenheit 451," are voicing their objections.
Key Westers can make up their own minds at multiple
showings of "Fahrenheit 9/11" at the new Tropic Cinema, 416
Eaton St.
The public premiere is at 8 p.m. today, followed by a
screening at 10:15 p.m.
Key West Film Society members may preview the movie at 5:30
p.m., following a reception at the cinema. Society founder
Michael Shields is responsible for Key West's inclusion among
the cities premiering the film.
The Tropic has scheduled "more shows than we have for any
other title," said Jason Rowan, publicist at the Tropic, where
the film will be screened five times on Saturday, four times
on Sunday, and three times a day through next Friday. "There's
more interest in this than any film we've shown so far. We're
excited to present it."
Disappointed not to see the film in his hometown is
lifelong liberal Mayor Jimmy Weekley, in Boston to attend a
mayors conference. "But I'll collar some mayors up there and
go see it," he said Wednesday. "I'm anxious to do so. This
film could have a big effect on the presidential election."
"Fahrenheit 9/11," whose basic premise is that President
Bush has something to hide, joins such films as Orson Welles's
classic "Citizen Kane" (1941) and Charlie Chaplin's "A King in
New York" (1957) in having difficulties finding a U.S.
distributor.
The delay for "Kane" was due to media mogul William
Randolph Hearst, who saw himself pilloried in the film and
purchased every print he could find to burn them. Chaplin's
"King," a comedy about the House Un-American Activities
Committee, was banned in the United States by the State
Department for almost 20 years.
Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" has been showing for months in
Europe, where it won the coveted Palme D'Or prize at the
Cannes Film Festival. But in the United States, the film's
backers, Bob and Harvey Weinstein of Miramax, were refused
distribution by parent company Disney and had to bring in a
Canadian company, Lion's Gate, to get the film out.
Moore is no stranger to censorship. Immediately after the
9/11 attacks, 50,000 copies of his book, "Stupid White Men,"
were pulped by his publisher HarperCollins, a Rupert Murdoch
company.
The national reaction to Moore's acceptance speech at the
Oscars last year, when he won best documentary with "Bowling
for Columbine" — and pronounced the invasion of Iraq as
"Bush's fictional war" — was mixed. But the international
audience at Cannes in May this year gave Moore an
unprecedented 20-minute standing ovation for "Fahrenheit
9/11."
Film critic Robert Ebert saw the film in Cannes and has
described a number of its moments with relish, for example the
documentation about George W. Bush's release of his military
records: "He blotted out the name of another pilot whose
flight status was suspended on the same day for failure to
take a physical exam. This was his good friend James R. Bath,
who later became the Texas money manager for the bin Laden
family."
It is just this kind of eliding coincidence that is earning
the movie its critics on the left. Christopher Hitchens, a
Canadian-born writer for Vanity Fair, surprised liberals this
week with an attack on what he calls "Unfahrenheit 9/11." "A
sinister exercise in moral frivolity," he wrote in Slate, "a
windy and bloated cinematic 'key to all mythologies' ... I
don't think Al Jezeera would, on a bad day, have transmitted
anything so utterly propagandistic."
Earlier this month, author Ray Bradbury employed
four-letter words to describe Moore. The author of "Fahrenheit
451," published almost 50 years ago and made into a movie in
1966, told the Swedish daily Dagens Nyheter that Moore "stole
my title and changed the numbers without ever asking me
permission. He is a horrible human being, a horrible human!"
Today's opening on 500 screens is a historical world record
for a documentary. But the writer/director is upset his movie
has an "R" rating. "I want all teenagers to see this film," he
e-mailed his fans this month. "There is nothing in the film in
terms of violence that we didn't see on TV every night at the
dinner hour during the Vietnam War."
This week Moore warned fans that "the right wing usually
wins these battles. Their basic belief system is built on
censorship, repression and keeping people ignorant. They also
don't like pets and are mean to small children. And too many
of them are named Fred."
Mark Howell, senior writer for Solares Hill newspaper,
writes reviews and stories on contemporary culture for The
Citizen.
This story published on
Fri, Jun 25, 2004
Back to
Top